2 min read

Asset Protection Sought By Big Six Accounting Firms

Featured Image

Offshore Asset Protection Trusts are becoming the rage of the nineties. The setting up of an Asset Protection Trusts involves the initial structure of a trust in an offshore jurisdiction. Properly drafted this gives one protection against creditors and eliminates the creditors abilities to attach assets.

For those of you who are a bit skeptical on the usage of offshore trusts and entities, please be aware that recently reported in the Business & Economics Section of the European, a European-based weekly newspaper, that London-based, Price Waterhouse and Ernst & Young have been consulting with the Island of Jersey to promote new laws allowing limited liability partnerships to become part of the Jersey legal systems. This would limit the partners from those UK firms that have set up limited partnerships on the Island of Jersey to only be liable for the amount of their interest in the firm. Current United Kingdom law indicates partners that they are personally liable for any claims against the partnership.

The Island of Jersey?s finance and economics committee is putting forward the draft of a new law for debate by Parliament early in 1996. If approved, it will go up for vote by the United Kingdom Privy Council. Jersey, which has strong ties with the United Kingdom, and is the largest Island in the Channel Islands, which is located twenty-two kilometers off the coast of France. Jersey is attempting to promote itself as an offshore entity for all of the world, rather than simply as an entity for offshore Britain. Its proposals currently are aimed at attracting accounting firms from the United Kingdom to protect partners? assets from litigation. Jersey also has passed, and has in effect, varying laws that attempt to aid Europeans as well as Americans in the establishment of offshore asset protection trusts, International business corporations and other structures.

An offshore asset protection trust is an irrevocable trust, that is taxed as a grantor trust within the United States, and combines the ease of income taxation upon the grantor with protection from creditors worldwide. The author, however, utilizes and favors a different jurisdiction for an APT.

Richard M. Colombik, JD, CPA, is the principal in the law firm of Richard M. Colombik & Associates, P.C., and served as chairman of the ISBA Federal Taxation Council. He is an elected representative in the Illinois State Bar Association Assembly, Serves as liaison to the IRS district director, is an officer of the American Association of Attorney-CPAs and Treasurer of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association. Richard is a member of the Offshore Institute as well as a published author and frequent lecturer. He can be reached at (630) 250-5700.

Usage Of C Corporations Require Adherence to the Form and Substance

For all clients who use a multiple corporation set up, they are aware that they must submit invoices for services performed. The services must be...

Read More

Prime Rate Funds

Do your bonds have you feeling shaky since interest rates have no where to go but up?

Read More

Irrevocable Insurance

The Revocable Living Trust is a trendy topic for seminar these days. When you strip away all the hype, however, the Revocable Living Trust is merely...

Read More